Continuous support for women during childbirth
- PMID: 23076901
- PMCID: PMC4175537
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub4
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Update in
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23857334 Updated. Review.
Abstract
Background: Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine.
Objectives: Primary: to assess the effects of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies; (2) the provider's relationship to the hospital and to the woman; and (3) timing of onset.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2012).
Selection criteria: All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care.
Data collection and analysis: We used standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Two review authors independently evaluated methodological quality and extracted the data. We sought additional information from the trial authors. We used random-effects analyses for comparisons in which high heterogeneity was present, and we reported results using the average risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data.
Main results: Twenty-two trials involving 15,288 women met inclusion criteria and provided usable outcome data. Results are of random-effects analyses, unless otherwise noted. Women allocated to continuous support were more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.12) and less likely to have intrapartum analgesia (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96) or to report dissatisfaction (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79). In addition, their labours were shorter (MD -0.58 hours, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.31), they were less likely to have a caesarean (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91) or instrumental vaginal birth (fixed-effect, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), regional analgesia (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99), or a baby with a low five-minute Apgar score (fixed-effect, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.95). There was no apparent impact on other intrapartum interventions, maternal or neonatal complications, or breastfeeding. Subgroup analyses suggested that continuous support was most effective when the provider was neither part of the hospital staff nor the woman's social network, and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available. No conclusions could be drawn about the timing of onset of continuous support.
Authors' conclusions: Continuous support during labour has clinically meaningful benefits for women and infants and no known harm. All women should have support throughout labour and birth.
Figures
Update of
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21328263 Updated. Review.
Comment in
-
Women who receive continuous support during labour have reduced risk of caesarean, instrumental delivery or need for analgesia compared to usual care.Evid Based Nurs. 2013 Apr;16(2):40-1. doi: 10.1136/ebn.2011.100194. Epub 2011 Sep 25. Evid Based Nurs. 2013. PMID: 21949277
Similar articles
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 15;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23857334 Updated. Review.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21328263 Updated. Review.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28681500 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous support for women during childbirth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636733 Updated. Review.
-
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28426160 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 30 articles
-
Antenatal education for childbirth: Labour and birth.Eur J Midwifery. 2020 Apr 23;4:11. doi: 10.18332/ejm/120002. eCollection 2020. Eur J Midwifery. 2020. PMID: 33537613 Free PMC article.
-
"Ashamed, Silent and Stuck in a System"-Applying a Structural Violence Lens to Midwives' Stories on Social Disadvantage in Pregnancy.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;17(24):9355. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249355. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33327578 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of the doula program in Northern Taiwan.Tzu Chi Med J. 2020 Apr 1;32(4):373-379. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_127_19. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec. Tzu Chi Med J. 2020. PMID: 33163384 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e039098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039098. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33115900 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of companionship during delivery and associated factors among women who gave birth at Arba Minch town public health facilities, southern Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 2;15(10):e0240239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240239. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33007048 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous